University of Edinburgh
Department
of Archaeology
Occasional
Papers Series No 20
UK
ISSN 0144-3313
Copyright
D. W. Harding, 2000
Research
since 1980, notably in the Northern Isles, but also that promoted by the
University
of Edinburgh in the Western Isles since 1980, has contributed to a re-appraisal
of the origins and development of monumental Iron Age roundhouses in Atlantic
Scotland, demonstrating that broch towers have their origins in a sequence of
massive roundhouses, simple or complex, dating from the mid-first millennium
BC.
To
extract the developed broch towers from that context and to dismiss any
structure which can be shown to pre-date the first century BC on the grounds
that it is not a ‘true broch’ is to create artificial definitions and
distinctions which cannot contribute to a balanced view of later prehistoric
settlement. Furthermore, it divorces ‘brochs’ from other groups of stone-built
roundhouses whose similarities have too frequently been overlooked or
suppressed in an attempt to create distinctive structural typologies. As Parker
Pearson and Sharples rightly observed, ‘the diversity of stone-built dwellings
almost defeats the classification of brochs as a meaningful group’ (1999, 364).
At
opposite ends of the spectrum, a simple, ungalleried roundhouse and a broch
tower may
justifiably be seen as poles apart; but they are just that, extremes in a
spectrum in which
the contrast of opposites is not the whole or only truth. In practical terms
the rigid typological definition of a ‘true broch’ was of little utility to the
fieldworker, who was unlikely to be able to tell from a collapsed heap of
stonework whether any individual structure displayed the required repertory of
architectural features anyway, so that only a handful of the hundreds of known
field monuments was ever likely to qualify.
Interesting but I think I have read somewhere (if only I could remember where) that you can estimate the height of a building from "a collapsed heap of stonework" Think about the ruins of old blackhouses - and the thickness of the walls.. there wasn't a great height required there and the wall thickness is nothing like the wall thickness we have seen on our trips to brochs/duns. Hut circles - a few stones - they didn't need to support much weight. If there is a massive amount of stone remains of walling - whether galleried or solid - it would seem logically to indicate that this mass was expected to support a great deal of weight- the foundations being massive to support a considerable height of wall.
ReplyDeleteJoy, I think that might be from one of Ian Armit's books - I read it somewhere, too. He talks about it in 'Towers in the North' around p58-p59 but not quite the way I remember. I think I agree with the prof. that rigidly defining a 'true broch' is almost counter-productive. Yes they are inclined to fall into groups ... but there are always some that don't quite fit.
ReplyDeleteA value commonly used by archaeologists to classify brochs is the percentage-wall-base value (PWB), the ratio of the overall external diameter ED taken up by the wall-base, first defined by MacKie (1974).
ReplyDelete(ED-ID)x100/ED = PWB
Most of our brochs give a value of 40-45, compared to Dun Telve (47), Dun Carloway (48), Dun Troddan (49.7) and Mousa (64.4!)
I agree with Su that we can get too bogged down in defining brochs (or anything archaeological) and so lose sight of the 'big picture'. We shouldn't imagine that prehistoric people had a 'Barratt Home' style template of any building. They knew what they wanted in general, but adapted the style to fit with what they had in the way of manpower and resources.
ReplyDeleteAlan Broch Researcher, 11 Ose, Isle of Skye,
DeleteThe Romans must have written down something about the broch towers they saw, when sailing round Scotland.
I am at the moment deciphering Ptolemy's Map from Ancient Greek into English and that is not easy.
The Roman Forts is what I am working on at the moment and have managed to decipher two into English.
I am know going to try and decipher the many words that are in areas where Brochs or Duns have been found. One of the words was the name of a tribe called the EPIDII but I am hoping to find a word to represent TOWER or FORTRESS.
The Romans wrote down many things of interest but it is just trying to find out where they put the information.
We all need to try and find the information by using other sources and to not get bogged down with what has already been found.
I agree with Talla, take a new way.