Dun Grugaig , Skye
26/7/16
26/7/16
I fancied looking at Dun Grugaig because:
- - It was said to have some similarities with the
promontory fort at Rubh an Dunain – our last trip
- - We had
already visited one of the two Dun Grugaigs on the mainland. We visited the Dun Grugaig near Glenelg on 17th May but there is another Dun Grugaig near Dornie that we have yet to visit.
- - I thought it was time to venture down to the
south of the island.
Hence with minimal preparation I set the destination as Dun
Grugaig.
As the date grew nearer and I had had limited time for research, I began to regret my choice.
As the date grew nearer and I had had limited time for research, I began to regret my choice.
Euan Mackie, (https://canmore.org.uk/site/11442/skye-dun-Grugaig)
describes the site as “a dangerous site to visit because sea erosion has
narrowed the neck of the promontory and the clefts in it – next to the path –
can be concealed by bushes.”
I had already extracted the directions from the excellent
little book “In search of prehistoric Skye” by Ian Donaldson-Blyth (available
from Portree Library). Donaldons-Blyth
says “care is needed when exploring this dun since the cliffs on which it
stands are high and the edges unguarded and in some cases hidden by the
vegetation. This is no place for young
children or excitable dogs”… that seemed OK – no young children and the only
dog likely to accompany us is always on a lead and not excitable…but maybe a
warning was required. However, experience has shown me that his directions are now
out of date. So, with the aid of google,
I found more up-to-date directions.
Finding description of chest high bracken, brambles and birch
scrub obscuring the cliff edge I was seriously doubting my choice of field trip
– especially as the weather forecast wasn’t too promising either.
My final decision (one which other members of the group had
come to themselves after their own research so we all agreed) was to give it a
go – and if the vegetation and/or weather beat us we would give up and do Dun Ringill
instead.
We deviated slightly and successfully from the various
directions given. A suitable parking
place (not a passing place and not obscuring the traffic!!) was found just
beyond No 3 Glasnakille. We ignored
the stile mentioned in Les Hamilton’s otherwise useful description at http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/site/5136/dun_grugaig.html
A few metres north
of No 3 and of the stile there is a fence. With this fence on our right, we bravely entered the jungle of brambles,
birch scrub and bracken on a steep and muddy slope. In reality, only the first few metres were
difficult and this is the stage which is nowhere near the cliff so there is no
danger beyond being caught by brambles or losing one’s dignity by slipping into
the muddy slope.
Soon a faint path
appeared beneath the extremely high bracken.
We stayed close to the fence (to facilitate retreat) and much sooner
than we expected the Dun was visible in all its glory – but there was a gully
between us and the Dun… a very short retreat took us to a route directly
leading to the entrance.
There may not be a
lot of this Dun left but when it suddenly becomes visible after the short fight
through the “jungle”, it presents a glorious view. We were transported back almost 3,000 years
in time.
This one definitely
requires a re-visit when vegetation is lower to get better photographs but I
hope I can edit this blog later and include photos better than mine.
Far better than any
photos, Kathy Lindsley of Ravens Press Gallery in Colbost, really did the Dun
justice with her engraving:
http://s3.spanglefish.com/s/4088/pictures/dun%20grugaig%20strath194.jpg
http://s3.spanglefish.com/s/4088/pictures/dun%20grugaig%20strath194.jpg
Inside the entrance
there is a curious triangular shaped ledge – the shape of the stone above
does not give the impression that stones are missing – it really looks like it
was planned as a ledge..for a lamp?
Sadly the photo does not show this clearly
Archaeology notes:
Canmore shows the
1921 plan:
Mackie describes
this as an unexcavated semi broch or galleried dun. He says “ There is a clearly defined
chamber above the passage roof which communicates with the interior; its right
face is traceable all the way forward as far as the massive front lintel.” But we,
in our ignorance, were unsure of identifying this chamber
The scarcement he mentions is clearly visible. As Mackie says this is unusually around 2ft
below the level of the passage lintel making access to any higher level
difficult. Also unusual is the fact the remains
of a stairway go in an anti clockwise direction – apparently only otherwise
seen at Clickhimmin in Shetland. Several
other architectural similarities to Clickhimmin lead Mackie to suggest that
this is an early structure within the broch type class, possibly dating to 6th
or 7th century BC.
Professor Harding writes "Far from being one of the earliest of the proto-brochs, as MacKie suggested, Dun Grugaig might well belong instead to the early historic period. There are several other sites, less well preserved, on Skye which might belong to this same category of rectangular, roofed promontory duns, including Dun Ila, Dun Beag [Torrin], and possibly Dun Pharuig [Dun Faich]."
ReplyDeleteBy "early historic", what exactly does Harding mean? (BTW where is this comment by Harding from?)To me early historic would be after written records - and let's face it - there are no written records for this part of the world for a long time after the broch builders - but I suppose we could count history as when the Romans reached the southern parts of Scotland... 1st Century AD? What evidence does Harding suggest for his dating? Personally without evidence to the contrary, I prefer Mackie's idea of this being earlier than brochs - simply because the brochs seem to be more sophisticated.
ReplyDelete