Search This Blog

Showing posts with label U3A archaeology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label U3A archaeology. Show all posts

Tuesday, 28 February 2017

Dun Sleadale Part 2



Dun Sleadale is unlike other brochs we have visited.  Most of the brochs we have seen either have a clear view of the sea or are in line of sight of other brochs which do have views of the sea.  Dun Sleadale is a mere 1.2 km from the sea but the sea is not visible at all and there is no clear line of sight to the nearest brochs (as shown on modern OS maps) .  On the other hand the broch is not visible from the sea either which, in itself, is a useful defence from any sea invasion.

For plan and background information see
Dun Sleadale - part 1 







First things first - a bite to eat and drink before scrambling over the broch



Location of Dun Sleadale and other nearby brochs/duns






The trek up to the site was interesting after several days of wet weather – a very, very muddy stretch between gorse bushes, followed by a rather boggy stretch, followed by a steep trackless climb and the broch doesn’t come into view until the last minute. 

Access to the broch was possibly never easy as the original entrance is on a steep and craggy slope.   

 
Entrance as seen from lower down the slope

Today, it is rather easier to enter via the west – via the entrance to the later sheiling constructed inside the broch.

RCAHMS and Mackie (on Canmore) say the original entrance is on the east-north-east, Swanson says the entrance is on the east.  Our compasses say it is pretty well due East.

Entrance

Possible lintel from entrance - recumbent


Su expounds her theories on the orientation of broch entrances

The “fine scarcement” described by Mackie is not easy to identify but is probably most clearly seen just to the north of the western entrance, ie the entrance made by whoever constructed the sheiling.  The gallery described by Mackie and Swanson is clearly visible and other hollows within the walls indicate further stretches of gallery or a cell.

 
Lintels of gallery

Outside the broch, to the north there is a well defined trench, which looks man-made.  This is described by Swanson and shown on her plan as “quarry trench”.



 



Recycling stone seems to have been very popular in the post broch period - as well as two sheilings constructed inside the broch, there are also a few outside.













Having looked at the broch, we spent some time watching a couple of eagles across the valley and trying to decide – without binoculars – whether it was a golden or a sea eagle.  The one thing we all agreed on was that it was not a “tourist eagle”.  Final decision - white tailed!

 


Leaving the broch we made observed several circular shapes on the other side of the Sleadale Burn and we wondered whether these might be enclosures or hut circles.  A little later we saw three workmen clearly puzzling over another circular structure – this one did not appear to be prehistoric.




Gradually we made our various ways down.  Hoping to avoid the mud bath, some took the high road and still got muddy; some took the low road and had to climb a fence but we all got down without mishap and retired to the Old Inn to discuss our theories.  Su had re-produced plans of all the brochs we have visited – but all to same scale and all pointing north so we could compare the orientation of the entrances (evidence not very conclusive).  Steve T produced maps to illustrate his hypothesis that the entrances overlooked the likely broch territory.

References:


 Carol Swanson


Canmore

Discussion continues here dun-suladale-3

Friday, 20 January 2017

Dun Suladale



Dun Suledale (17/1/17)also written as Suladale
NG 3744 5255





Directions



A track, marked on the OS map, leads S off the A850 Dunvegan-Portree Road.  

Apparently the land where the broch is situated is a grouse moor so visiting in the winter is a good idea and visiting in summer, after the glorious twelfth, is probably a very bad idea.


Although not marked on the map, once you pass through the gates at the beginning of the track, it appears to branch off in three directions.  Take the track on the right, heading south.

Follow this excellent track for around a mile.  The broch will become visible on the left.  Continue on the track until almost level with the broch then set off over the rough, heather covered and rather boggy moorland.   Leaving the main track too early is not recommended as this will mean more boggy ground and watery burns to cross.



The broch

 The name Suledale (Suladale), according to Forbes, may mean Dun of the solan geese (see post on placenames) Solan geese are northern gannets.  I am no bird expert but I have only seen gannets right on the coast.  This broch is not that close to the coast.  So is the name origin wrong or is this perhaps the name of the tribe who built the broch?  Certainly some bronze age/iron age tribes apparently used animal names, almost like a "totem"...cf Epidii (supposedly related to horse god - tribe in Islay)
 

 The broch is in better condition than many we have visited.  The stones of the walls are very even in size and shape.  At least two "guard cells" are visible as well as a short flight of steps.  


Stairs


Cell in NE




















The "passageway" to the entrance
There is some evidence of an outer wall and there are two lines of stones forming a passageway from that outer wall to the broch entrance.   Mackie seems to imply that this may not be original.... " a passage through the rubble to the broch entrance has been cleared here in modern times" (https://canmore.org.uk/site/11143/skye-dun-suladale)



 In summer 2015 AOC Archaeology did a survey of Dun Suledale using laser scanning – their results offer a far better description of the broch than I could attempt so just follow the link:

http://her.highland.gov.uk/hbsmrgatewayhighland/DataFiles/LibraryLinkFiles/292815.pdf
From AOC report


Survey plan from AOC report

In 1948, Mrs Edward Hilleary of Edinbane donated a few items, apparently found at/near Dun Suledale, to the British museum - the question marks on the datings are as written in British Museum Catalogue.

1.      Small sub-spherical stone bead, flattened at perforation. Traces of red colouring.  No image available for this one.  The description at the museum helpfully assigns the bead to “Neolithic? Bronze age? Iron age?”

  1. Copper alloy spiral ring; made of thin strip forming four coils, and tapering to point at either end. Early Iron Age ? Late Bronze Age? 
    http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/search.aspx?searchText=Dun+suledale


  1. Stone polisher, oval, flattened through use. Neolithic? Bronze age? Again no image available
Such finds would seem to indicate that this area was inhabited long before the broch was built.

This blog will be updated after our visit on 31/1/17 and improved by better photographs - taken by more skilled photographers than I am.

Continues : https://u3a-skye-archaeology.blogspot.co.uk/2017/02/dun-suladale-2.html